In our current PLT we have been looking at aspects of how we can take PBL to a gold standard. In the book "Setting the Standard for Project Based Learning" by Larmer, Mergendoller and Boss our group has been exploring the different aspects of PBL by unpacking the ideas presented and assembling them into gold standard PBL.
Our expert group focused on Chapter 4: Designing a Project. This chapter broke down "project design" and allowed us to review some of our current projects in order to make them more rigorous and authentic.
Being relatively new to the idea of Project Based Learning working out what "gold standard" is was a new concept, as I thought that PBL was already at a standard deemed worthy of "gold". But as always, there is room to review and improve.
From my understanding it has to start with the design of a good project. Much like a good lesson or unit of work you would have, the time frame is crucial. It can't drag on for too long or be too short, missing key learning goals and skill development. Speaking of goals, what are the goals you want to achieve? I have found that by benchmarking these goals in my classroom, allows the students to work towards the higher level of attainment and not just them "going through the work" for the sake of it. The structure is important too - like a great movie using a three-act structure it should have a first act, middle and end. In the classroom this would translate as a variety of activities and resources to engage and address the learning in these three "acts".
On the flipside, as a PBL newbie knowing what the process is NOT meant to be helps cement these ideas more. The breakdown in the text was interesting:
Project based learning is not the same as "doing a project.”
- “Dessert” - projects are described as being a reward to the students for getting through all content that needs to be covered in the curriculum.
- “Side Dish” - projects allow the students to have “fun” with the project and create their end product at home,
- “Buffet” - projects - we would call this ‘Contract Learning’, where students complete a range of activities from a selected list. Choice is involved, but students aren’t working towards a final product throughout the learning
These projects don’t offer the full gamut of student learning experiences that PBL offers. The elements of a unit of work have to gel together and connect. This might take more pre-planning but I think the outcome would be significantly more conducive in the classroom.
Ultimately, from discussion with the PLT group, the initial setup is one of the most important parts. The complexity and depth of projects come in time with the start of the process and can only develop into "gold" from there.


